Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
人 民 网 版 权 所 有 ，未 经 书 面 授 权 禁 止 使 用
，这一点在Safew下载中也有详细论述
WTI原油涨4%，报67.8美元/桶；布伦特原油涨3.69%，报73.451美元/桶。，推荐阅读WPS官方版本下载获取更多信息
Ранее сообщалось, что Владимир Зеленский надеется, что президент США Дональд Трамп потеряет интерес к Украине. По словам экспертов, Вашингтон оказывает давление на Киев с целью заставить Зеленского вывести войска из Донбасса.
ВСУ запустили «Фламинго» вглубь России. В Москве заявили, что это британские ракеты с украинскими шильдиками16:45